There is a gulf of difference between those presenting information in good faith and the big pharma guys on here.
One of these core differences seems to be the absolute reticence for these guys to produce any of the so called studies discrediting NCQ + its adjuvants within the parameters commonly ascribing to some success. All you get is reports of studies. You can almost put money on a link now being provided to one of the misrepresentative studies (well maybe not now that I mentioned it)
Sure, we know there are studies where people were OD'd, treated on their last legs (on ventilators etc), treated without the full co administrations and on and on. But where are the 'official' big pharma studies within the parameters. It cannot be a accidental oversight. (and yes I expect a 'So what are these parameters' obtuseness to present itself)
- Forums
- World Politics
- hydroxychloroquine
There is a gulf of difference between those presenting...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 119 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RDN
RAIDEN RESOURCES LIMITED
Dusko Ljubojevic, MD
Dusko Ljubojevic
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online