"....those presenting information in good faith....."If you call...

First 146 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Glug

23,927 Posts.

1

20/09/20

13:12

Post #: 47482516
Share

Originally posted by BugGold: ↑

So it seems that after a lot of the huffing and puffing and time wasting the hydroxychloroquine status quo remains..............

That there is a gulf of difference between those presenting information in good faith and the big pharma guys on here.

One of these core differences seems to be the absolute reticence for these guys to produce any of the so called studies discrediting NCQ + its adjuvants (such as antibiotics and zinc) within the parameters commonly ascribing to some success. All you get is reports of studies or links to the irrelevant. You can almost put money on a link now being provided to one of the misrepresentative studies (well maybe not now that I mentioned it)

Sure, we know there are studies where people were OD'd, treated on their last legs (on ventilators etc), treated without the full co administrations and on and on. But where are the 'official' big pharma studies within the parameters. It cannot be a accidental oversight. (and yes I expect a 'So what are these parameters' obtuseness to present itself).

Those interested in progress will just await further information as it comes to hand..........

Expand

"....those presenting information in good faith....."

If you call presenting dodgy studies and reaching dodgy conclusions based on those studies, as "in good faith", then you are 100% wrong. As it isn't "in good faith", it is a deliberate attempt by charlatans to deceive the gullible.

_

If you randomly select 10 people out of 160, then claim whatever you give the 10 is proof that X is a cure is pure nonsense.

We are still waiting for anyone here to put up a credible study/trial that shows actual proof that Hydroxychoroquine is the saviour of the human race.
5 Upvote

Reply