They are out again the posters who have nothing.
They downramp but fail to provide any support for their arguments.
What is the situation as we go into today?
Why do poster want to talk down our SGH shares?
- - We are currently discussing a possible D4E with our new lenders
- - Research shows that on average hedge funds take 35% ownership
- - Research shows that on average hedge fund involvement is for the benefit of current share holders
- - As per announcements we will remain solvent and have just been provided with $40 million of headroom working capital so we can continue to improve our financial performance
- - Company values get worked on based on estimated discounted future cash flows (so current share price has got nothing to do with proper company valuation)
- - We are in the process of putting forward a lawsuit against Watchstone for more than $1 billion
- - We have a positive independent barrister’s opinion on escrow worth 50 million pound
- - We are hiring NIHL staff in the UK (what does that say about our NIHL portfolio which is not even in our financials?)
- - Much much more.
They want them for next to nothing.
They won’t be getting mine J
All in my opinion.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- I am back. So is SGH
They are out again the posters who have nothing. They downramp...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 809 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online