I am back. So is SGH, page-711

Why do you seem to be avoiding the huge difference between an activist minority SHAREholding and a massive DEBTholding that dwarfs the company's market capitalisation?

Can you name a single case similar to the present situation where it's been better to be a pre-existing shareholder than to invest after any D4E consolidation?

To answer your question. Yes, as a non-holder I can clearly live with the situation where the share price has drifted lower. As a holder, how happy have you been to watch your initial investment drop to what? A half? A third? A quarter? on very low turnover.

Why do you think there is very little buying, even at these low prices?

All in my humble opinion.