[an incredibly foolish statement,
penned by some phenomenal process, driven by a attempt to sound clever.
shame that this particular inclination became so popular
from time to time this phrase is heedlessly and unwittingly re-born, devoured from the gutter, and then regurgitated.
the statement supposes (and implies) that there is some irreducible "I" that thinks.
and pays no consideration to the what is meant by the very misleading word "exist"]
phenomenal arisings and ceasings that were labelleding with titles such as "gautama" or "mystic", never drew attention to such nonsense; but rather, conveyed evidence/information on suffering and pointings to the cessation of suffering.
whatening is giving rising to whatening, in the current neighbourhood (no, not now)?
whatening is likely to give rising to whatening, before whatenning can be arising?
