There are some very interesting things being eluded to here in this thread and in the post referred to. The post itself is irrelevant without some validation of the identity of the author.
I must say that the post does ramble a bit with no clear train of thought making me question it's authenticity (just an observation, not a criticism) but I'm happy if I'm wrong about this. That said, if the author is genuine and has facts to substantiate the inferences then this is something that every shareholder should be very interested in.
If there is something that needs to be exposed then let it be done clearly and concisely, point by point.
MST is but a shell of its former self. If its decline has in fact been orchestrated as is the inference then we have been robbed and we should recognise this fact and push and seek redress and rebuild MST to meet it�s full potential. Lets see a coherent description of all the issues then maybe we will all know if this company is worthy of our continued financial support and more if the inferences are true.
There are some very interesting things being eluded to here in...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?