Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

With regards to the use of my wording You said my term used in...

First 28 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jopo

15,291 Posts.

28/05/22

16:27

Post #: 61680013
Share

Originally posted by tinnitus ↑

Column O first table : Unit of measurement - No of electrons per atom per molecular mole = 8.7 E+24
Column Heading P : Unit of measurement - Total number of electrons per mole etc .

Think through what this unit that you have come up with means . That for every atom in a mole of ( I guess ) earths atmosphere there are 8.7 E +24 electrons.

Your unit says every atom . And in column G you actually list the number of electrons per atom and not one of those is near 8.7 E+24 .

Again you state No of electrons per atom per mole .

So Your units , or your description of them , look wrong at the start .

You have added up the Number of electrons per mole of Earths Atmosphere.

Have you conducted a dimensional analysis of your outcomes ?

This is the point that Lomu made .

Expand

With regards to the use of my wording

You said my term used in Column "O" NO. of Electrons per atom / molecular mole is misleading

I guess I could have said ......NO. of Electrons per mole of atoms and molecules. I am sure you knew straight away what it means. It depends on how you interpret it. For me it is clear. However it is a good point that needs to be rectified as we dont want to get bogged down in minutia
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...

First 28 Last