have to agree butcherboy you often have good input but i don't...

  1. 2,320 Posts.
    have to agree butcherboy you often have good input but i don't think a cut and paste of wikipedia is decent research. Would you purchase a stock based on a wikipedia entry...I doubt it. But hey not a fair comparison - the health of yours and the general public Vs spending a few thousand $...

    Dig a little deeper and you might find some questions/issues that make you not so sure about forced flouride medication. For one natural flouride is diffent to man made flouride. There are also a number of countries that do not add fouride but have seen similar improvements in tooth decay as countries that add it.

    Anyway I'm not on a anti-flouride crusade but at the same time I don't think it is clear cut and would prefer to have the personal choice. Even your wikipedia entry states itself" "studies on adverse effects have been mostly of low quality". This does not equal no adverse effects.

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.