Before some of you jump on the high horse and take out of context what am I saying i will get in first.
I am not saying this paper is a smoking gun.
In fact it is a neutral paper.
What i am saying is the need for extra information. It has highlighted the production ratio a few times in that paper. It has highlighted that UV is involved in Co2 production. But cannot find correlation.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- I say BS for Co2
I say BS for Co2, page-41
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 135 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)