His calculations are meaningless junk.
Here is tonight's energy generation.
79% non-renewables. And anytime you look, you'll see a good percentage of non-renewables (I never see much below 50%).
So why is the graph by David Osmond all green and yellow?
He just imagines there is ??% more renewables than present.
"The generation data for wind, rooftop and utility solar data was rescaled to supply ~60%, 25% and 20% of demand respectively over the year. For example, over the last year utility solar generation has met 5% of demand. The target for utility solar was 20%, so I rescaled the last 7 days of utility solar data by 4x (ie, 20% divided by 5%)." - https://reneweconomy.com.au/a-near-100-per-cent-renewables-grid-is-well-within-reach-and-with-little-storage/
Not to mention 120 GWh of battery, which is about $22 billion every 12 years.
Others have also questioned his cost calculations.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- I thought renewables were cheap????
His calculations are meaningless junk.Here is tonight's energy...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
HAR
HARANGA RESOURCES LIMITED.
Peter Batten, MD
Peter Batten
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online