Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

I told you it was, page-7

First 7 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

46,671 Posts.

643

28/03/24

14:27

Post #: 73105433
Share

Originally posted by pugsley100: ↑

I seriously doubt this has any validity....

It's more to do with households rather than individuals and the amount of tax a household pays and benefits they receive.

For many households that will vary as the particular "household" passes through time.

A household in child bearing years might get more assistance associated with raising and educating the kids but when the kids grow up the parent household might move into net payers until they get old and start using more of the health care services.

Expand

but do these benefits exceed the quantum of tax they pay?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

3 stocks with antimony news on Thursday

GTR

GTI extends uranium mineralisation at Lo Hema through development drilling

CU6

Clarity progresses SECuRE trial with positive safety results

DXB

Dimerix begins recruiting young kidney disease patients in Mexico for Phase 3

CHN

Chalice jumps on Putin nickel export ban threat – but then there's bad news

There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...

First 7 Last