It's a blatant pre empting of the verdict which IMO, if the trial was in session would constitute contempt of court. The author insists the forecast acquitted should not be subject to the resulting fury but rather it should be directed at a system which fails to deliver justice for all.
Note to author - our court system is not about justice per se but rather is based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. To ignore this basic tenent of law is to advocate for kangaroo courts, driven by media vigilantacy as practised by the ABC squad. Idiots.
