Now after 4 years and huge $dollars spent on drilling...

Now after 4 years and huge $dollars spent on drilling kilometres, we have a lower resource than the initial 25mt @2%(reduced to thanks to regulator).

Rocklands Central according to the release accounts for 48.6% of total resource (page 14), and so your reference to ?Las Minerale presents as a robust project in its own right. And it will be! Buoyed up by confidence and quite amazing drill results, and this is a winner philosophy? sounds like more ramping together with a lack of understanding. I could continue, but I leave as usual the finite picking of negative posters comments and long winded extrapolations to yourself. It still sounds to me like you are trying to ramp the price up still for your own gain, due to your large holding. I notice the other line you have been pushing for years and trying to build a case around is the takeover bait. It sounds like a detective who has decided someone is guilty first, and then tries to build a case to support that.

I gave up posting on CDU mainly because of being gang tackled by the pro posters who would not tolerate balanced discussion. It appears you are continuing where you had left off pre JORC.

?I remain convinced that mining will reveal the sort of cash flow projections more akin to a 30 mt @ 2% Cu equiv mine for 10 year?

Either give supportive documentation, or cease in your unsubstantive delusional guesses?.otherwise known as ramping in the first degree. A JORC has been completed by experts, yet you know that it will be 60% bigger for 10 years. This is the type of comment that urged many onto your own bandwagon.

With the degree and closeness of drilling, ?measured resource using a code that is not greatly suited (IMHO) to a complex, variable unique orebody such as Rocklands? you would expect a true assessment would be made, and thus another throw away unsubstantiated comment.


You should be ashamed of having not only dragged others in when wrong, but more so, continuing on. Have you not learnt yet?

Your colourful ramping words should be replaced with facts. You need to sin bin yourself!!!!


?I still maintain that I'm correct?.To my credit?..Anxiously anticipated good news seldom delivers the sort of market response that everyone is expecting??sting operation??.The play here would be to try and keep the share price as low as possible no doubt through the efforts of untraceable third parties?.predator?..quite amazing drill results??.If a bid does emerge, give some serious thought to a possible sting operation that I have outlined(read presently only a fantasy of mine?still)?to shake as many share holders free as possible in an attempt to massively destabilize the company( I think this has already happened has it not?).,.,?passionately and energetically??we are going to be ok (should read we are not)??.a project that still returns superior value for copper hungry investors