nah dipstick it's just one of many validations of CAGW, as you...

  1. 10,515 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 207
    nah dipstick

    it's just one of many validations of CAGW, as you know

    if you want to just be narrow minded and only look at ice loss there are plenty of longer term records, here, for starters
    https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/sea-ice-extent-sinks-to-record-lows-at-both-poles

    but glacier loss
    but ocean acidification
    but increasing atmospheric specific humidity
    but increasing land and sea temperatures
    but extreme record CO2 and greenhouse effect
    etc

    but you want to look at only oct and nov ice mass
    good for your narrow minded thinking
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.