Ignore calendar year headings and funding method. Year 3 shows what happens if and when PGM price bounces by 30% from here. Quick and dirty,
Economics could stack up at current prices, esp if long awaited met work shows we can produce a concentrate at low cost. But to get to FID we need bankable supply deficits. They’re coming.
Reckon there could be a much smaller get started plan with much lower capex. But we’re in the dark.
Ignore calendar year headings and funding method. Year 3 shows...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
