Mr Gordon, I have no wish to argue with you because neither one of us has enough knowledge to be rigidly unmovable in our beliefs, but certain truths have no need of the complex unravelling of Scripture.
All of the above died, true, as did Jesus. Jesus died in body but His words rose from the grave after three days of grieving and uncertainty by His followers.
No sinful condition was inherited from Adam. Adam is a generic figure that represents each and every human being and their quest to hear and obey the word of God. The story tells us that at every turn we will be challenged by our very nature, the snake representing materialism, worldliness and our attachment to transient things over the tree of life, which is the eternal voice of God coming through the various Prophets of God.
If Jesus is great because He had no father, then Adam is twice as great because he had no father or mother.
The true life of Jesus was His word. His word is eternal, his body was always destined for the grave.
Nobody will ever wish to be resurrected back to physical life on earth once having died, nor will anybody be resurrected back to physical life. Physical life has its purpose and once that purpose is served there would be no sense in being stuck eternally in such a life. To me that sounds like a perfect description of hell.
As for Romans 5:19, the one man is all men. We are all made sinners in the sense that as we evolved from past more instinctive forms, those animalistic survival traits remain with us. We are spiritual beings on one hand and animals on the other and so must fight against our base natures continually.
Jesus did not die that anybodies sins might be forgiven. He died because He did not deviate from His purpose, that being to provide a teaching that one might save themselves from their own sin. Nobody, not even Jesus can bear another's sins because this would be a gross injustice. We each own our own sins, but via following the teachings of Jesus we might free ourselves of sin. In this sense only did He die for our sins.
Lastly, if Jesus was the "one person" that could atone for sin then we have a problem.
This then renders God as a bigoted, prejudiced, incapable of unconditional love, unjust being who has loved only the Jewish peoples of 2000 years ago and has abandoned the vast majority of humanity because He can Create a universe but can't love all of humanity at the same time.
This is clearly a nonsense as you fully understand, because we can plainly see that every peoples had their own Prophets, or Messengers or Teachers from God. Every gathering of humans anywhere in the world had instructions from God via their own representative from God. Nobody was ever left behind.
These teaching may differ, but not so much in their moral codes, because different peoples developed at different rates and the teaching where specific to their needs. This does not suggest then that one Teacher is then greater than another. All Teachings where needs based and relative to the capacity of the audience.
So clearly if you wish to claim Jesus as this "one and only" being, you do so by seriously denigrating God to becoming some petty, uncaring entity unworthy of anybodies worship.
This is why these Christian-centric beliefs are so false and harmful.
Expand
