dont disagree with your conclusions but on that first paragraph a few comments. when you say PR continues to hold his life savings in par, didnt he sell circa $10million bucks of shares to buy a mansion? Also the use of the term life savings is questionable imo as did he actually stump up cash to buy his 20 million shares on market! Also on the point of why would he just do this for wages, well $1m plus p/a is a bloody good “wage”.
the way i see it is if we went broke then PR still collected 10mill mansion and say 7-8 years of a million wage per annum. Other than his credibility which he has already lost imo, he cant lose financially. He can win big time but its not the binary investment outcome we all face Gltash
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)