if you did some research, page-9

re: another question for seejay or others who want Seejay thanks for the reply.


In my way of thinking the depth potential seems pretty good for the deposit style and when you plot-up the central 500 meters on section it seems pretty robust albeit that the spaccing is a bit wide. In any case seems enough to jusitfy the 20-25 million tonnes (assuming the estimated SG is correct).

So on that basis I think a double or triple of the 25 million tonnes is a pretty good bet.

Any comments?

Did you plot up the sections?

seems be a reasonable basis for the 25 mill tonne resouce.

No reason why this thing wouldn't go down to