This is nothing derogatory to the poster.......but i am...

This is nothing derogatory to the poster.......but i am dumbfounded that 18 posters felt this provided realistic valuable information upon which to base an investment decision on to invest in NKP.

I repeat, i own (lots) and fully support the fundamentals supporting NKP...........but if this ancedotal postage information is how some of you out in cyberland are relying on to part with hardearned money....... you need help.

So, to answer the original question of that post, not including the time value of money (or reconstruction):

1c shares in 2003 for PDN has now realised you $3.84 per share today
2c shares in 2003 FMG has now realised you $4.89 per share today
$1 share in 2003 for NKP has netted you a mega loss......because had you undertaken a peer analysis, DCF with appropriate risk assessment back then, you would not have paid that much.

Going forward........NKP is still cheap........but again, the story told being told to derive the outcome is irrelevant.

No brainer ppls!