if you need an excuse to buy gold companies

Sovereign Debt Crisis

--It's going to be a shocker today. Well, not so shocking. The futures markets are predicting a 2.5% fall in Aussie stocks. This follows an awful Friday on Wall Street in which the Dow fell 250 points (2.57%) and the S&P shed 2.81%. A worrying sign (unless you're a bear) is that the volatility index is again on the rise.

--Maybe it's the end of the dollar carry trade (where speculators sell risk assets). Or maybe not. Whether that little thesis turns out to be correct we'll know in due time.

--In the meantime, there are some other things we might learn this week. First up is the TD Securities - Melbourne Institute Inflation Gauge. This will probably show that except for food, fuel, energy, healthcare, and housing, prices in the economy are stable and inflation is contained.

--One quick note about this: there is obviously plenty of inflation in the prices you pay every day. But most consumer price indices are rigged to understate inflation, as our colleague David Evans pointed out yesterday in Canberra at the Gold Standard Institute conference in Canberra. Trimmed medians...hedonic adjustments...there's quite a bit of statistical hocus pocus going on.

--Inflation is evident if you just follow the money. The returns on wealth (rent, capital gains, income from bonds) are accruing to that group that's benefitted the most from low rates. Dr. Michael Hudson called them the 'financial oligarchy' in his recent trip to Australia. This group has benefitted from inflation in the form of higher asset prices. And meanwhile, the Fed and other central banks have been able to say their policies are not inflationary because consumer prices and, more importantly, wages, aren't moving up.

--Duh.

--Is it really a surprise that there's no inflation in wages in a world where tens of millions of workers in emerging market economies are willing to do the same work as those in Western economies, but at much lower prices? Wage deflation is the order of the decade. Maybe the century. You generally won't find inflation in consumer prices or wages. But that doesn't mean it isn't there.

--So what will the Fed and the Reserve Bank do this week? The RBA meets tomorrow and everyone is expecting another rate rise. The Aussie dollar has all but priced it in. The RBA also puts out its commodity price index week and its always exciting quarterly statement on monetary policy which we just can't wait to pore over for signs of continued credit and debt growth in the Australian economy.

--Westpac will also post results this week. If it follows the lead of NAB and ANZ, it will report higher-than-expected bad debts, but claim the bad debt cycle has peaked. Don't be so sure, though. And why not?

--Well, over the weekend, CIT Group Inc. (NYSE:CIT), with US$71 billion in assets, filed for the fifth-largest bankruptcy in American history. CIT is the latest victim of the credit crunch, which obviously still isn't over. It's a commercial lender to small businesses that's been unable to refinance its debt. As a non-deposit taking bank holding company, it has to finance asset growth through securitisation and borrowing, both of which are still pretty hard to do these days.

--CIT's Chapter 11 allows it to restructure under the protection of the courts. Bondholders might make out okay. The U.S. Treasury, though, has already lost $2.3 billion in TARP money it put into the firm. And the biggest losers are the small businesses who will no longer have financing. That's bad news for the real economy.

--As deposit taking institutions, the Big Four Aussie banks are not nearly as vulnerable to this kind of crisis as CIT obviously was. But as we showed last week, Aussie banks still rely on quite a bit of short-term borrowing in the wholesale funds market abroad, borrowing money from foreigners to financing lending here. That's always going to be a weakness.

--Hold everything!

--Last week we warned that a result of the Fed's low rates is that U.S. banks have stocked up on U.S. Treasury bonds and notes to stabilise their balance sheets. We warned that this could put the banks at risk again, IF the value of those bonds was slashed by market forces. You'd get another bank collateral wipe-out which could, if large enough, wipe out equity. Insolvency becomes an issue again.

--But don't underestimate the ability of the bond bubble to go on longer than anyone thinks. The Feds meet this week and will probably not change a thing. Its formal program to buy Treasury bonds and mortgage backed securities with newly created central bank reserves (quantitative easing) can always be extended. So should bond bears like your editor (who agrees that U.S. Treasury bonds are a great short) be wary?

--Yes!

--The reason is a new regulation passed by Britain's Financial Services Authority which lays out new liquidity rules for bank assets. Rolfe Winkler has the story in his blog. The short version is that the FSA may require banks to own a certain percentage of assets that can quickly be liquidated to raise cash if need be. Lower credit quality assets (junk bonds or lower rated corporate bonds) might not qualify.

--What that means - if you read between the lines - is that the only assets which would meet the new liquidity requirements from the FSA are sovereign government bonds. Now maybe this does make bank assets more liquid. But we wouldn't say owning more government bonds makes bank assets any safer, or improves the capital position of the financial sector.

--What it DOES do is give the government a way to force new bond issues down the throats of banks. Rather than having to find creditors among the high-saving emerging market nations, governments in the UK and the US would have a captive market in their own financial sector. The banks would gradually gorge themselves on sovereign government debt, provided Moody's or Fitch or Standard and Poor's didn't downgrade the credit ratings of the US and the UK.

--It sure looks like another move toward the nationalisation of the financial sector, although in a very clever way. And the banks probably don't mind that much right now. Trading government bonds with new Fed money was a virtually risk-free trade that propped up bank profits in the first half of the year. It's a good trade.

--But in the bigger picture, as Nial Ferguson and Ken Rogoff mentioned this weekend, this means that the financial crisis may soon become a sovereign debt crisis. So far, the liabilities of financial firms have been transferred to the public sector balance sheet. But this has not solved the problem. It's merely moved it to a larger stage on which it must play out.

--As we mentioned in our remarks yesterday at the gold show, we believe this marks the beginning of the end of the Super Cycle in paper money. A sovereign debt crisis is the same as saying that the funding model for the fiscal welfare state is broken. Only in this case, there is no organisation large enough to bail out the fiscal welfare state. What does that mean? More on the consequences, and the opportunities tomorrow.

--"This is the first time I've been in Canberra," we began our remarks yesterday. "I spent most of last night trying to figure out what it reminded me of. And then it came to me. It reminded me of Washington D.C., and not in a good way. I spent four years in college living in DC. Both cities make you feel like you've stepped onto a very orderly and sterile brothel."

We've been wondering in this space recently about the kind of world the next generation will inherit. Clearly the trend for the long haul points to a shift of power, and a migration of wealth, from West to East. As we routinely report, the roaring Asian economies have amassed enormous piles of foreign reserves, much of it in US Treasuries.

In part due to this shift, these economies - China, India, Brazil, etc. - command an increasingly important role in the geopolitical arena. In addition, these New Economies on the Block are forging important trade ties with each other and inking deals to secure their mutually beneficial future, ex-US.

The United States, meanwhile, is up to its ears in ever-mounting debt...both to its creditor nations in the Middle and Far East and, to an even larger extent, to its own citizens.

And so we ask ourselves, will the young Johnnie and Jenny Smiths of the West be able to bluff their way through the next round of negotiations with a pair of twos? Or will the Changs, Patels and Ahmeds of the world call their bluff and take them to the cleaners?

Unfortunately, the trouble started for Generation iPod before they even had a chance to cause it for themselves. "Like America itself," observes Bill Bonner, "[Young Americans] are in danger of finding themselves slipping downhill. Instead of expecting things to get better, they may find it hard even to hold onto what they've got. Instead of the 'Morning in America' that Ronald Reagan promised, they may find that it seems more like evening, both in their personal as well as their national lives."

Much of America's international influence was acquired during a time when the dollar roamed free and easy as the world's reserve currency. French President Charles De Gaulle called it an "extraordinary privilege."

At its height, the greenback commanded a magisterial awe and its position was largely considered unchallengeable. But no challenge is too great for the mighty US government...especially the challenge to debase its own currency.

It is true that extraordinary privileges carry extraordinary responsibilities. Within a single generation, the irresponsible goons in charge of preserving the dollar's integrity had destroyed almost all of its purchasing power. Measured against gold, it has slumped some 97% since Nixon closed the gold window in '71. And now, when the Treasury Secretary of the United States of America tells a classroom of Chinese university students that his nation's currency is trustworthy and reliable, they laugh in his face.

Then, on top of an increasingly worthless currency, Generation iPod also inherits about a quarter of a million dollars each in unfunded Social Security and healthcare obligations, the overdue infrastructure bills of a crumbling nation, a couple of distant wars to fight and die in and a world full of disgruntled foreign creditors.

Is there any hope?

Opined John Mauldin on the subject in Tuesday's issue: "It is not the times which dictate the man (or daughter!), but the response of the man which dictates his own time. Today has a brighter future for someone young than any other time in history, whether they are in the US or Brazil or China. They just have to seize it..."

Echoes Bill, "The real advantage in life is having the gumption to get on with it; no one knows where that comes from."

Indeed, history provides us with countless examples of individuals triumphing over adversity. A hard working American student has every chance to succeed in life, as does a hard working Asian student. It's just that, on the whole, graduating classes of Asian engineers and computer programmers are far more diligent than graduating classes of Western feminist film studies students.

Taiwanese university graduates, for example, would happily take on the workload of most western jobs as a vacation, never mind as a vocation. The forty-hour workweek (35 for our French readers) is something students here manage between classes...and cram sessions...and helping run the family business...and music lessons...and English school in the afternoons and evenings. Not only have the Asian countries already outworked the west over the past generation - by a measure significant enough to now own virtually all of the western countries' debts - but they continue to up the ante even now. They have raised the bar, in other words, and they are raising it still.

A generation ago, Mao Tse-Tung did his people a huge favor and finally died. His successor, Deng Xiaoping then told the Chinese masses not to fear wealth and that, in fact, to get rich was "glorious." It was a stark contrast to the self-immolating edicts spewed forth from Mao. The people rejoiced...and got to work. Last year, China created millionaires at the second fastest rate of any nation on the planet. Only India outpaced her. Meanwhile, America "demoted" millionaires quicker than any other country could manage. England was next on that dubious accolade.

The people in this region of the world are hungry...and they are only now beginning to taste the fruits of their labor. As finite resources - energy, food, land, water - stretch over the coming years to meet exponentially growing demand, Generation iPod needs at least to know what they are up against in the scramble to stake their claims.

And, not unlike the Eastern generations of yore, they must work hard to succeed, despite the impediments their government impose. This unfolding reversal of fortune between the West and East does not simply suggest that American college students might face a less inviting future than their parents faced. It also suggests that investors might find a more inviting future in the Emerging Markets than they will face in the Developed Markets.