I agree, 6 1/2 percent of the company in options is outrageous. 87c for the first truancy of options is OK but the price should have increased from there, thus providing an incentive or perceived incentive for the board and company to increase shareholder value.
Personally I can not vote to provide 6 1/2 percent of the company as options even if it is David Williams, who I think will do a great job and be hugely valuable.
I agree, 6 1/2 percent of the company in options is outrageous....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 103 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IIQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
61.0¢ |
Change
0.020(3.39%) |
Mkt cap ! $67.26M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 58.0¢ | 61.0¢ | 58.0¢ | $56.05K | 95.11K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2999 | 59.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 61.0¢ | 12999 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IIQ (ASX) Chart |