Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Ok, I have to bite once more...You do realise the...

First 668 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Rookierror

61 Posts.

11

13/10/23

14:09

Post #: 70330317
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

"why they are disconnected, and who is responsible for the disconnect. ". .. this is the result of all prior Govs decision making, including during the "advice" by the NIAA who managed these orgs. this is what will remain with a No! vote success.

the constitutional insertion is a different matter to the Voice per se. the Uluru statement has asked specifically for constitutional placement because each previous Voice granted them has been abolished, mostly on ideological grounds.

they asked for the constitutional insertion so that if a future Gov wants to abolish the Voice they must first ask voters for permission via a referendum. nothing more than this.

Expand

Ok, I have to bite once more...

You do realise the representatives of the Uluru Statement were appointed - not elected - with zero consultation from the indigenous peoples of the area?
Much to their dismay.

Kind of goes against the very thing you're advocating for.
10 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

KAU

Kaiser Reef reports new A1 untapped gold zone – flags move past 'remnant mining'

BM8

Battery Age Minerals gets set to capitalise on critical mineral demand

ASX Market Update: Index pulls back from record highs | October 16, 2024

PME

Pro Medicus snaffles 5-year contract extension worth $32M for RIS technology

MKT

The ASX can overlook its Telecomm small-caps. Here’s one diversified brand with an international footprint

There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...

First 668 Last