Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Why doesn’t China remove the offical name of Tibet and simply...

First 22 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
MirCat

9,890 Posts.

86

28/05/23

15:08

Post #: 68002014
Share

Originally posted by johngalt815: ↑

Of course they would dummy, why wouldn't they?

The People's Republic of China is still officially at civil war with Republic of China, and the US is providing weapons to the ROC which officially claims all of mainland China as part of its constitution. Australia is allowing US hosting warships and bombers to the ROC, so of course they will target Australia, it's common sense.

If Tasmania separated from mainland Australia in a civil war and officially claims all of mainland Australia in its constitution, and China is providing weapons to Tasmania, how can we NOT be hostile to China??

Expand

Why doesn’t China remove the offical name of Tibet and simply refer to it as a province of China?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

RCE

Recce scores US$2M deal from US Department of Defense for burn wound infections gel

Shekel Brainweigh and Calmer Co lead innovations in the retail space

Week 28 Wrap: ASX hits all time high; CBA shares' two realities; US inflation hits 3% ahead of China plenum

ARN

Aldoro shares jump 47% on news of strong niobium recoveries from Namibia play

I88

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

There are more pages in this discussion • 56 more messages in this thread...

First 22 Last

SPONSORED BY