Sorry but not an acceptable response. The 'number' was included in a price senstive public announcement outlining the terms and included the word must. There may be any number if potential suitors that would be prevented from discussion while within the window, and to now trivialize that window undermines the process. The wording must legally implies a forfeiture or otherwise process at the point the window expires. However Glyn's response trivializes that in addition. Further as this was as mentioned a price senstive announcement, Obj is legally obliged to issue an announcement at conclusion of the window period detailing the outcome. Have any other posters that actually receive responses from Glyn, raised similar concerns - would be interested to corroborate. Especially when Glyn to date usually responds with 'a wait for a public announcement' approach, however in this case, the question and issue are 100% in the public domain, yet chooses to respond with '90 days is just a number' ????!!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Imminence Truly Inevitable
Sorry but not an acceptable response. The 'number' was included...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 121 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online