The main questions should be:
"(Hypothetically) If a Presidential candidate has been exposed through Wikileaks for knowing that a country supports, funds and supplies a declared enemy of the US (ie ISIS) yet the candidate carries on business relationships and is found to have been receiving money from that and other countries through an illegal PAY to PLAY arrangement while also disobeying a subpoena which would allow such information to be released to Government and public, should that candidate be allowed to become President?"
"If a Presidential candidate uses a non-secure email server to avoid Government archiving and FOI laws, and then allows incriminating emails to be deleted days after a subpoena request had been made for them, should they be allowed to run for President?"
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Important question for the 3rd Debate
Important question for the 3rd Debate, page-31
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 59 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)