Share
10,598 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 6071
clock Created with Sketch.
21/01/22
07:50
Share
Originally posted by FishiesPal:
↑
BPAA is 100% correct in his point, this current board, called for a pre-emptive trading halt and continued that trading halt week in, week out, therefore stopping current shareholders from making their own financial decisions, to sell, buy or hold. They had an option to lift the trading halt anytime before entering into negotiations to sell the asset. This is his point. For some on here to belittle the commonsense and fact in his statement due to their own loyalty to management, is pig headedness. I agree for management to put their hands up for pay rises whilst in this position, amounts to just pure greed. I truly hope for everyone's sake here, they do recover all the monies owed and find a solid asset to re-invest into. I also hope you don't have to wait too long before you can decide to sell or hold out. GLTAH
Expand
Originally posted by BPAA:
↑
What was skilled and relentless? Selling a tier 1 mine for a fraction of the value they placed on it? Not allowing holders to make their own financial decisions on if they wanted to exit or hold? Unless you have information no one else does then I don't see any skilled or relentless examples you mention except for asking every Thursday for the suspension to remain in place and then selling it for pocket change knowing that we couldn't begin trading again locking up everyone cash for another 6-12-18 months? They have failed, some of it was beyond their control, some wasn't, I only judge them what they can control and we've seen nothing except them putting there hands out for a larger pay packet
Expand
You guys really don't have a clue. As pointed out my myself and others, on more than one occasion, ...it is not the MYL team asking for these suspensions, it is the ASX demanding it.