Hi Billdah,The way these articles tend to work - particularly...

Hi Billdah,

The way these articles tend to work - particularly when it sounds like this one, ie no mention of other companies or the resource and its implications, is that the company writes it and is more or less a puff piece.
There is zero journalism here. The writer clearly did no work or investigation. The paper has allowed itself to be used as a mouthpiece for the company. As such, the article should be given little value. Anything material would need to come through the ASX.
If anything RA is trying to suck in a few more punters and create some more awareness. It all seems dodgy to me - no matter if it is commonplace practice or not.

1.35m cubic feet is FAR from impressive.

Still, if you get in at current levels you can probably make a quid or two. Those options must be expiring soon so management should start ramping the crap out of it...

Management is far from competent - have held in the past and luckily squeezed a few shekels out of it - but would give it a pretty wide berth except for a short term spec in and out.