The 16 years of inaction "argument" has been used in relation to claims that it might be in the "public's interest" for RIO to hold the lease. People here are saying that Caz's MOU with BHP v Rio's inaction speaks volumes for the public interest argument.
The 16 years of inaction "argument" has been used in relation to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CAZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(5.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.764M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | 1.9¢ | $2.552K | 134.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 139578 | 1.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0¢ | 425001 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.58pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CAZ (ASX) Chart |