Hi ShabandriDid you ask the black wizards (geophysicists) about...

Hi Shabandri

Did you ask the black wizards (geophysicists) about what they thought of the EM anomaly? I'm interested in the EM-VTEM surveys, and there are some questions niggling away at me:
- is there anything else contributing to conductivity of host rock or is it mostly sulphides causing the anomaly?
- How does the anomaly measure up to other komatite-hosted nickel sulphide deposits in the region, Cosmos etc.
- Is there indications of high % sulphides at depth?
- How prospective are the other VTEM anomalies?
- Is there a lot more to be tested at depth, have they only just scratch the surface of the anomaly?
- were they actually present during drilling?

I'm interested in what they have to say, I will try and give them a call if I get a chance at work. From what I have read from announcements the anomaly looks quite exciting, it looks like it has been modeled up as a steeply dipping sheet to match the geological model of sulphides at base of ultramafic host rock? What I think is really exciting is that the anomaly continues to 500m depth which is what I understand the limit of the survey method, and that the drilling has only just intersected the very top of the anomaly. I can't wait til they do this downhole EM and drill the guts of the anomaly. Some good assay results in the short term will also be quite handy.

GL
Cheers
Michael