I just read through the previous posts, especially the ones on the answers that gave when were queried by shareholders.
The answer that "leave if you like" is absolutely poor performance prototype that doesn't care about shareholders' value - which is supposed to the their first priority.
The jump of last year I believe was a pure trader based behaviour. They might be good, responsible people and have operated the company in a conservative and responsible style but they certainly do not match what's considered good board of directors.
Simply put, Mandilla might produce good resources reserve but won't be developed into anything bigger unless in a different hand.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AAR
- incompetent board
incompetent board
Featured News
Add AAR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
7.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $72.01M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.7¢ | 7.7¢ | 7.6¢ | $714 | 9.275K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 113436 | 7.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.7¢ | 367068 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 113436 | 0.076 |
1 | 1728 | 0.074 |
1 | 30000 | 0.072 |
1 | 20000 | 0.071 |
2 | 80000 | 0.066 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.077 | 367068 | 1 |
0.079 | 62000 | 2 |
0.080 | 566523 | 1 |
0.083 | 78800 | 1 |
0.084 | 175992 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 29/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AAR (ASX) Chart |