increased change in substantial holding, page-32

Hi Guys,

We are just assuming on what outcomes will provail.

It has never been stated that this last ann was in a negative sense, it just specified that for the large scale mining that BRL will want to commence cannot be approved by local council.

This writer in the article in the paper has only spun things around assuming outcomes. He is the only person that said we need to appeal because of the rejection which is not true.

I personaly am happy that we are going to deal with head of state government, because then we do not have to keep asking for local council permission after every little stage.

This way we get only one approval once for a LARGE scale minign operation, and then we can concentrate only getting the bauxite out of the ground, instead of argueing with local councils.

The AGM tommorrow should specify info in regards to this matter.

PS: Like i said before, these sophisticated investors have recently invested large amounts of money.... trust me they know a hell of a lot more than what us " little boys" know... lol

:)