increases in rainfall extremes linked to agw, page-60

"Accepted truth"? Sounds like "1984".

"Established science is over 100 years old" - what does that mean?

"Long time periods of a decade or longer, consistently show the systematic warming cause by our carbon dioxide pollution."

That is arrant nonsense. You have been sucked in by logical fallacies, or scammers portraying models which fail the most basic tests in practice. There is no proof to back up your statements. We have had CO2 at 20,000 ppm and the world did not fry, rather it was a time of great expansion of species - so warming is not necessarily bad, nor is it necessarily caused by CO2.

LOL. A decade is not a long time period.