ICN 0.00% 0.6¢ icon energy limited

indication of potential value of atp855

  1. 8,548 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2816
    if you ever had any doubts about how valuable ICN's share of ATP855 might be, have a read of this.

    This is a copy of a Euroz report.
    It has just been posted on HC on BPT thread.

    It is publicly available
    http://www.beachenergy.com.au/IRM/Company/ShowPage.aspx/PDFs/2892-35796836/EurozSecuritiesLimited

    the reason I have posted it here are obvious.

    the bits I was surprised at is the bullish nature of the report, and the statements wrt cost advantages of development, and fact that they seem to be saying that, given the flows of Holdfast and ENcounter, that field devt might be feasible with just vertical wells - ie not laterals?

    they also refer to non-shale potential

    and the value they attribute to 218, must necessarily flow thru to 855 - if you assume "play" extends across border.

    ((( also:
    "ullage"- vacant container space - the amount or volume by which a container, especially one for liquids, is short of being full"
    2. lost liquid - the amount of liquid lost from a container through evaporation or leakage"

    "contango" - interest payable when delivery delayed : interest payable by a broker when the delivery of and payment for stock is postponed

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Investment Case
    We maintain our positive view of the large upside potential of BPT’s
    unconventional Cooper Basin JV (CBJV). The size and scalable
    potential of the unconventional assets make BPT an attractive
    investment in an Australian mid-cap energy sector where growth and
    optionality is hard to find. The current 10+ well programme can create
    significant share price momentum over the CY. We retain our Buy with
    a price target of $2.00/sh.
    Key Points
    - Production for the Dec Q of 1.72mmbboe was in-line with our
    expectation.
    - Reinstatement of the Tantanna pipeline in the Western Flank
    has enable BPT to maintain guidance of 7.5mmbboe for the
    full FY.
    - The PEL91 and PEL92 Western Flank programme has netted
    3.5mmbbls to BPT, pre-Bauer.
    - Discovery and successful appraisal of the Bauer Field should
    add materially to Western Flank inventories and capacity to fill
    expanding, 15,000bbl/d (BPT av equity 55-60%) takeaway
    capacity (due for commissioning from mid-CY).
    - The Esso royalty for BPT’s Delhi asset was successfully
    renegotiated at a lower effective rate.
    - An unconventional well programme has commenced
    comprising: 3x horizontal (from Jun Q) and 5(+3)x vertical
    wells from the Mar Q.
    - Encounter reservoir stimulation expected to be commenced
    mid-Feb.
    - The Moonta-1 well is drilling ahead and will test 400-600m
    thick Patchawarra Formation’s tight gas potential.
    - A data room was opened in the Dec Q to attract potential
    farminees for the unconventional CBJV programme.
    - BPT successfully acquired ADE following its unconditional 20
    cents per share on-market offer.
    - This valued ADE at ~$94 million for its Cooper Basin interests

    that included ADE’s 200Bcf share of the Holdfast resource.
    Analysis
    The large upside potential remains with BPT’s emerging Cooper Basin
    unconventional gas play and the realization of higher east coast gas
    prices supported by domestic and export demand growth.
    We believe that should BPT’s shale project demonstrate economic
    viability, the Company – given the size potential of its Cooper Basin
    interests – is the best placed to attract corporate attention.
    We are of the view that the shale/tight sand qualities will drive some
    exceptional (+10mmscf/d) flows from the horizontal wells in time and
    that opex of <$4/mcf will be achievable in a development scenario.
    We also flag that the cost-benefit equation may yet see large swaths of
    the Cooper Basin Shale (in a development scenario) be developed
    with vertical drilling given the consistency (in terms of productivity),
    pressure support and thicknesses of the Roseneath-Murderee-Epsilon
    and Patchawarra unconventional sequences.
    This would obviously dramatically lower well capex cost hurdles,
    providing for compelling economics, should vertical flows of 5mmscf/d
    be established: We believe this highly probable.
    Our price target set is ahead of our $1.83/sh valuation reflecting the
    huge upside to the unconventional 2Tcf gas resource we foresee with
    the upcoming 10+ well programme: The revised resource (Dec H’12)
    could several orders of magnitude higher. In the interim we believe
    that substantially more flow data will highlight the economic viability of
    the play which could elicit a corporate outcome within the next couple
    of years.
    Thus huge optionality exists in BPT for its shale project (>$2/sh
    additional value) - we factor a nominal shale value of only $0.20/mcf
    for a conservative 4 Tcf of recoverable gas from the CBJV - $800m.
    This compares with implied 3P reserve metric range for Australian
    CSM transactions of $0.53-1.88/mcf over the last 5 years. Our
    valuation without any value for the CBJV is $1.15/sh.
    As a sense-check, we highlight the value potential BPT clearly see
    through the implied $0.47/mcf paid for ADE’s 200Bcf vs the $0.20/mcf
    we assume in-ground.
    With long term east coast domestic gas contracts rolling off over the
    next 5yrs, projected demand growth, coupled with potential supply
    draw from GLNG is suggestive of a contango in gas pricing that can
    realize +$6/mcf.
    Whilst Exxon-BHP are making noise regarding the potential for
    currently stranded Gippsland gas molecules to meet some of this
    demand, we are a little more circumspect that an offshore gas
    development can be sanctioned within this 5yr window of opportunity.
    We’d argue that an onshore unconventional gas resource is more
    nimble to incrementally meet the growing demand because:
    1) The capex to establish new supply is incremental ie well
    by well vs offshore that requires a large appraisal drilling
    capex hurdle (say $20m/well) before capex for
    development and landing ashore is considered
    2) Capital commitment is therefore much easier for a well by
    well development on that basis as relative gas pricing
    uncertainty vs large capex to first production will slow offshore
    development traction
    3) Ease of access to takeaway capacity for the Cooper
    Basin due to existing network of infrastructure
    underpinning short tie-back
    4) Sufficient existing ullage: Moomba is already short gas
    with Santos already committing purchase of a substantial
    portion of BPT’s existing conventional gas reserves
    In any event, we foresee that significant landholder opposition and
    environmental regulatory hurdles (beyond which back-fill gas for rampup
    CSG gas if at all) exist in the CSG to LNG sector that will drive corporate outcomes to secure additional ‘insurance’ gas.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ICN (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.