Great, back to the points being made re Super. Much talk appearing here and there about super being used as an inheritance vehicle to pass on wealth, based around a stated premise '90% of super funds have final balance similar to their starting balance at (initial) retirement'. Hmmmmm, factcheck?? However, the argument based on this (dodgy) premise is that super funds should be heavily taxed when 'passed on', thus retirees would spend up more (while alive) which is good for stimulating the economy...
Obviously very spurious arguments to create a dangerous presumption to justify routing of the system sooner or later, a $3 trillion gold mine mine for the govt to utilise to feather their irresponsible spending habits etc. Very concerning. Stay awake
