info, page-17

I think the word is spelt "purport" not "proport". If you are inferring that I am falsely suggesting that I am buying at these levels you are incorrect about that as well. Go right ahead and mislead others, that is your intention is it not?

I really love your anal-ysis:

"The last buyer in the last trade for mnm at .061, (they lifted the price from .051) who paid $99.45 for 1530 shares must be kicking themselves that they didn't wait and get the same shares at .055 for $84.15, a significant saving of 15%."

OR $15... ROFL

I guess you have striked out pelm. Wrong about the definition of MC, wrong about the spelling of purport and wrong about my intentions. But no pelm, another quality post by a quality poster. Have to rub that ego of yours....