Pleased to help hopeful2 and dave787 - but of course you were...

Pleased to help hopeful2 and dave787 - but of course you were reading 'my' take on the proceedings - so hopefully it was as fair as I intended.

BRR - To try to frankly address your 'specific' AGM queries (and recalling that I'm just an interested person that was attending the meeting) I'd say outright that although all items were discussed - see Lee's Report - no further i.e. 'extra' details beyond what we know were provided on the Colt arrangements, nor on the MPM, and also no timelines noted for the Force Protection gig. I put any perceived lack of extra details 'yet' down to the simple fact that MST has an exemplary record of releasing info to the market (as they are obliged to do) as it comes to hand in a finalised format. I should perhaps add an obvious that the timelines on the mixed Force Protection gig (for one) are not actually MST's call, but will be up to the relevant principal contractors for the different tasks. Anyway like I said in my earlier post, the atmospherics at the AGM were different i.e. 'calm and good', and with another meeting required very shortly .............. it 'was' my strong impression that we might reasonably drop the shoulders a tad and enjoy sitting tight until Luxinvest were fully on board, and monies in the bank, which will be soon enough. So although the AGM didn't actually say either way there was/was not a link between actual cash in bank and some of those future project announcements being made, I'm good with that interpretation as it passes the common sense test.