Two articles I read this morning:
1. Solar Panels are more pollutive than using gas fired power:
- The energy to produce panels in China using Aussie fossil fuels
- The lifespan of the panels
- The pollution & cost to recycle
Therefore, less energy to not produce the Solar panels & just use Gas fired power generation
2. China not using market forces to make panels:
- China subsidizing fossil fuels
- Using "forced labour" "Uyghurs"
So is the cost of Solar Power & Energy storage really environmentally advantageous?
Perhaps CSG in time will be proven more environmentally favourable to humanity's future?
Why can't we get science to provide an environmental roadmap in detail listing the impact & alternative ways to achieve an improved environmental outcome!?
There appear to be too many silo's of thought & never will they meet!?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLU
- information
information, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BLU (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.8¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $14.80M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.8¢ | $1.12K | 140.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
24 | 5512546 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.8¢ | 123172 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
24 | 5512546 | 0.007 |
9 | 10796999 | 0.006 |
4 | 3758347 | 0.005 |
2 | 1750000 | 0.004 |
6 | 2179000 | 0.003 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.008 | 123172 | 1 |
0.009 | 2205566 | 8 |
0.010 | 2493035 | 8 |
0.011 | 1348820 | 3 |
0.012 | 15000 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.17am 28/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BLU (ASX) Chart |