Tobyjack, in her initial post in this thread, specifically compares TON to SYR, and quotes the one paragraph in the entire article which claims that TON is better served for infrastructure than SYR. That is, Tobyjack has compared SYR to TON, and now appears to not want anybody else to respond.
Tobyjack claims to be not interested in TON, only in SYR. Her enthusiastic posts on the TON thread certainly don't support this claim. Funny thing, isn't it, that the only things about SYR that Tobyjack ever finds interesting are potential negatives.
Probably just coincidence.
Cheers, Whistler
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
28.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $297.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 28.5¢ | 30.5¢ | 28.5¢ | $1.828M | 6.236M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 78462 | 28.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 29.5¢ | 202265 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 11/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYR (ASX) Chart |