AQJ 0.00% 20.0¢ aus asia minerals limited

initial coal jorc compliant resources

  1. 20,449 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 268
    Company Announcements Office
    Australian Stock Exchange
    PO Box H224, Australia Square
    Sydney NSW 2000
    3 June 2008
    ANNOUNCEMENT HIGHLIGHTS
    • Pancaran Abadi Project – Initial JORC compliant resources completed;
    • Combined Resources of 27.26 million Mt from 6 drill tested coal seams; and
    • Area drilled represents 29.5% of total concession area
    Following the successful completion of the drilling program on the Pancaran Abadi Project (“Abadi Project”) as announced on 16 April 2008, Coal FE Resources Limited (ASX:CES) today is pleased to announce JORC Code compliant coal resource results from the drilling and resource modelling at the Abadi Project, as summarised below:
    Table 1: Coal Resource Summary
    Resource Category
    Metric Tonnes (Mt)
    Measured
    440,000
    Indicated
    14,578,000
    Inferred
    12,242,000
    Combined
    27,260,000
    The 27.2 million Mt combined coal resource is derived from the six (6) seams found in the concession area as detailed out in Table 2.
    The concession area of the Abadi Project encompasses an area of about 1,017 Hectares (ha) in Selo Lai Area, Muara Badak District, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. The detailed exploration and drilling were carried out in the south-western portion of the concession area measuring approximately 300 ha.
    Ravensgate, a minerals industry consultant, has been involved on a technical basis with this project since 2006. Ravensgate latest brief was to assess the JORC compliancy of the resource estimates done over the concession by Indonesian consultants, CV Mahameru Jaya. Ravensgate then undertook a parallel resource modelling and estimation program. The data used and the application of this data is outlined below as well as the ultimate results of this study.
    1
    Drilling Data
    Twenty two holes have been drilled within a 300 hectare block. Most of the holes were drilled along two NW running drill lines. These two drill lines are approximately 500 metres apart. Along drill line 1 the boreholes are generally spaced approximately 200 metres apart. Borehole spacing along drill line 2 is variable and boreholes can be as far as 400 metres apart in places.
    Six recently drilled infill holes were located between drill lines previously designated as lines 1 and 2. Drill spacing in the southeast of the block is much closer spaced than in the northwest. The thickest coal seams occur towards the northwest where the drilling is more widely spaced (see Figure 1).
    Figure 1:
    Map showing location of drillholes
    2
    Samples and coal quality
    Twenty samples were submitted to determine coal quality. The 20 samples constitute one composite value per coal seam. Six coal seams are developed in the project area. The remaining coal seam intersections might have to be submitted for analysis to bring some of the existing Indicated and Inferred resources into JORC compliant measured resources in the future after additional resource review and up-date.
    Ravensgate Resource Block Model Based Resource Estimate
    This identified Coal Mineral Resource Inventory Estimate for the Abadi Project is based upon Surface mapping and Surface Trench data intersecting the various seams seen typically outcropping in numerous locations across the project area. A summary of the observations and procedures used as well as any underlying assumption related to the resource modeling are outlined below.
    Methodology and Parameters of 3-D Resource Block Model:
    1. Resource estimates completed by Ravensgate using data prepared and provided by Coal FE Resources Limited.
    2. Drill spacing is generally quite widely spaced however is still adequate for coal seam definition when used in conjunction with surface mapping and trenching. All drill-holes have been oriented closely perpendicular to the coal seams which tend to dip at 7 degrees to the North-East (Azimuth 45 degrees) throughout the project area. The drilled and logged coal intercept data in conjunction with surface mapping and trenching data provides an adequate measure of “true thickness” which has been applied to the resource block model.
    3. All drill-hole collars were surveyed and checked to make sure they match the known surveyed topographic surface.
    4. Geological features and the overall coal profiles derived from the drilling data was verified and calibrated by surface trench mapping and channel sampling assay data. Coal seams were modelled to an accurately defined vertical depth of 120 metres from the current topographic surface. A total of 6 Coal seams were modelled – Designated sequentially as Seam 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6 with Seam 1 being closest to surface. Seam 4 is “non-sequential” and is actually an extension of Seam 2.
    5. The drill hole coal quality sample data used for block model interpolation were composited to uniform 1m “down-hole” composite lengths for general statistical analysis and for use in the localised assignment of coal quality parameters to the modelled coal seams.
    6. Careful 3-D analysis of drilling data and surface mapping data were used to assist the correlation of coal seams.
    7. Bulk Densities have been estimated from previous studies and was determined to be 1.3 tonnes / cubic metre for Coal. This density assumption was continued for this resource modeling study. Density variations are expected to be low and will be refined in future studies.
    3
    8. Block sizes used for the new Abadi block model were set at 8x8x1m (X,Y,Z) in order to accurately define some of the thinner coal seams locally.
    9. Block Grades were interpolated into the 3-D block models using rigorous localized coal seam constraining and a 3-D polygonal match interpolation. All coal seam geometries were carefully adjusted to match the understood overall known structural known.
    10. Resource classification was assisted by use of a “Quality of Estimate” algorithm which used a similar “3-D distance” of drill-hole from model block. This regime closely matched previous used resource classification regimes for the project area. This regime is briefly described as follows :-
    QLTY=1 – Coded Coal Seam Block is <100m from nearest Drill-hole containing coal quality analyses.
    QLTY=2 - Coded Coal Seam Block is 100-200m from nearest Drill-hole.
    QLTY=3 - Coded Coal Seam Block is 200-400m from nearest Drill-hole.
    QLTY=4 - Coded Coal Seam Block is >400m from nearest Drill-hole.
    In addition modelled coal seam blocks were beneficially re-classified when less than 20m from surface since coal outcropping by default increase classification confidence.
    Classification is then continued considering all resource modifying factors as QLTY=1, 2 or 3 for Measured Indicated and Inferred respectively. QLTY=4 defined material is of “low confidence” and not classified or reported.
    11. The reported tonnages and grades in Table 2 are in accordance with the guidelines and recommendations of the JORC code (December 2004) and Appendix 5A of the ASX Listing Rules. This resource estimate was carried out using accepted industry standard estimation methods and adhering to the JORC Code guidelines in estimating and categorising the identified Coal resources.
    Table 2: Coal Resource Inventory Summary For All Modelled Seams
    Abadi Project
    Inventory Summary
    30 May 2008
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    SEAM 1
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    134,160
    174,408
    8.26
    50.17
    0.76
    6111
    Measured
    2
    1,321,559
    1,718,027
    8.38
    50.06
    0.75
    6099
    Indicated
    3
    682,672
    887,474
    7.62
    50.75
    0.81
    6176
    Inferred
    2,138,391
    2,779,909
    8.13
    50.28
    0.77
    6124
    (Combined)
    4
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    SEAM 2
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    0
    0
    0.00
    0.00
    0.00
    0
    Measured
    2
    5,467,001
    7,107,101
    3.98
    45.53
    0.16
    5296
    Indicated
    3
    2,794,194
    3,632,452
    3.98
    45.53
    0.16
    5296
    Inferred
    8,261,195
    10,739,553
    3.98
    45.53
    0.16
    5296
    (Combined)
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    SEAM 3
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    32,210
    41,874
    13.30
    49.30
    0.32
    5767
    Measured
    2
    1,465,676
    1,905,379
    13.30
    49.30
    0.32
    5767
    Indicated
    3
    1,957,389
    2,544,605
    13.30
    49.30
    0.32
    5767
    Inferred
    3,455,275
    4,491,858
    13.30
    49.30
    0.32
    5767
    (Combined)
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    SEAM 4
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    50,484
    65,629
    13.30
    47.40
    1.84
    5690
    Measured
    2
    673,416
    875,441
    13.30
    47.40
    1.84
    5690
    Indicated
    3
    942,509
    1,225,262
    13.30
    47.40
    1.84
    5690
    Inferred
    1,666,409
    2,166,332
    13.30
    47.40
    1.84
    5690
    (Combined)
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    SEAM 5
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    36,236
    47,106
    6.27
    53.40
    1.20
    6300
    Measured
    2
    1,202,233
    1,562,903
    6.27
    53.40
    1.20
    6300
    Indicated
    3
    1,409,045
    1,831,758
    6.27
    53.40
    1.20
    6300
    Inferred
    2,647,514
    3,441,767
    6.27
    53.40
    1.20
    6300
    (Combined)
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    SEAM 6
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    85,323
    110,920
    14.05
    47.55
    0.44
    5731
    Measured
    2
    1,083,640
    1,408,732
    14.05
    47.55
    0.44
    5731
    Indicated
    3
    1,631,323
    2,120,720
    14.05
    47.55
    0.44
    5731
    Inferred
    2,800,286
    3,640,372
    14.05
    47.55
    0.44
    5731
    (Combined)
    5
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    TOTAL
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    338,413
    439,937
    10.74
    49.36
    0.84
    5940
    Measured
    2
    11,213,525
    14,577,583
    7.50
    47.71
    0.49
    5626
    Indicated
    3
    9,417,132
    12,242,271
    9.20
    48.41
    0.61
    5723
    Inferred
    20,969,070
    27,259,791
    8.31
    48.05
    0.55
    5674
    (Combined)
    Rounded
    Dry
    Basis
    Analysis
    TOTAL
    QLTY
    BCM
    Tonnes
    DASH1
    DVM1
    DTS1
    DGCV1
    CLASS
    1
    338,000
    440,000
    10.74
    49.36
    0.84
    5940
    Measured
    2
    11,214,000
    14,578,000
    7.50
    47.71
    0.49
    5626
    Indicated
    3
    9,417,000
    12,242,000
    9.20
    48.41
    0.61
    5723
    Inferred
    20,969,000
    27,260,000
    8.31
    48.05
    0.55
    5674
    (Combined)
    Legend:
    DASH1 = Ash% Wt (Dry Basis)
    DVM1 = Vm% Wt (Dry Basis)
    DTS1 = TS% Wt (Dry Basis)
    DGCV1 = GCV cal/g (Dry Basis)
    Location of Exploration Area
    The exploration area lies in the District of Muara Badak, Regency Kutai Kartanegara, Province East Kalimantan, Indonesia (see Figure 2). Balikpapan, the provincial capital of East Kalimantan, lies 110 kilometres due SW of the tenement. There are regular daily commercial flights between Jakarta and Balikpapan International Airport. The flying time from Jakarta to Balikpapan is approximately 2 hours.
    Balikpapan and Samarinda are joined by a 140 kilometre long sealed road. It takes between 2 and 3 hours to drive between these two towns. Samarinda is the closest town to the project area. Samarinda is a large, well organised town with all modern amenities.
    By road the licence area is approximately 60 kilometres from Samarinda. It takes approximately 2 hours to drive from Samarinda to the licence area. The first 30 kilometres is along a well maintained sealed road. The secondary, unsealed road leading into the licence area is in relatively good condition and is easily traversed in a four wheel drive vehicle.
    6
    Figure 2:
    Picture Showing Location of Exploration Area
    Physiography
    The area consists of low to moderate hills, ranging in elevation from 30 to 110 metres which covers about 90% of the concession area. The remaining area consists of flood plains and low swampy ground. Principal lands use is coconut palm plantations (50 – 60% of total area), particularly in the northern portion of the concession. Over the remainder of the area communal farming is practiced.
    Local drainages are generally shallow, with a number of creeks being ephemeral. April to October is the dry season. The wet season extends from November to March, with December and January being the wettest months.
    7
    Geology
    The Abadi Coal prospect lies within the Kutai Basin, which is a thick sequence of deltaic to shallow marine sediments of Eocene to Mid-Pleistocene age.
    The concession area is underlain by sediments of the Balikpapan and Kampung Baru Formations. Coal seams with economic potential are only developed in the Balikpapan Formation.
    Drilling has established that there are 6 coal seams developed on the property. The seams strike at between 2850 to 3560 and dip gently towards the east (at around 60-110).
    Future Direction
    Discussions are progressing with possible off-takers or joint venture partners for the extraction and development of the project.
    Coal FE’s evaluation work is continuing with Pre-Feasibility study to further improve the confidence in the known resources and for definition of additional resources. The Pre-Feasibility study encompasses infrastructure, environmental and social studies.
    Coal FE will continue to explore the remaining parts of the 1,017 ha concession for further resources as part of the agreed program in the Co-operation Agreement with PT. Pancaran Surya Abadi.
    CP Statement
    "The information in this report that relates to Mineral Resources is based on a resource estimate complied Mr Stephen Hyland, Member of the AusIMM who is also a full time employee and Principle Consultant of Ravensgate Pty Ltd. Mr Hyland has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves". Mr Hyland consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears."
    8
    Forward Looking Statement
    This announcement includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this announcement, including, without limitation, those regarding Coal FE’s business strategy, plans and objectives of management for future operations (including development plans and objectives relating to Coal FE’s production forecasts and resource and reserve positions) are forward looking statements. Such statements are based on numerous assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the achievements and performance of Coal FE to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements.
    9
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add AQJ (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.