"Lets not waste time talking about the past and who was right"I...

"Lets not waste time talking about the past and who was right"

I agree mate we're on the same team, but before I do move on compare the underground grades of Murchison and Daisy Milano in Silver Lake's resource statement, and you may see my point.

Murchison is 4 g/t and Daisy Milano 12 g/t. That doesn't mean Murchison underground is less profitable than DM. Greater widths and longer strike lengths make up for it.

And it's the same for CEB, that's the point I was making... we just don't know what optimal grades (eventual reserve) will be once the ore goes through the mill given trial results. It may be more profitable mining over greater widths, lower grade (more tonnage) than the other way round especially over long strikes using mechanised mining... or maybe not if widths pinch and swell alot

Anyway, Davis will determine the best way forward for all of the underground assets and it will be very interesting to see how he prioritises and ranks them all in the development schedule.