interesting article, page-2

Gee whiz dargie I think you need to go back and reread some of my posts of a few weeks ago.

Please acknowledge that I did say that I had taken the statement by the Chairman at the end of October to be a relevant and UP TO DATE comment.
I EXPECTED an important officer in the company to be presenting the most up to date statistics at the AGM.

The fact that he was hopelessly out of date at that important meeting is not my fault. I can only go on what I thought should have been relevant info at that stage of the year.

When you pointed out "the error of my ways" and I had done a bit more in depth research myself I was prepared to acknowledge that that what you were saying was pretty correct.

Just acknowledge that I have moved on and that I am not to be continually smeared with this attempt to suggest that I still hold true to what the "uninformed chairman" said.

You have not been prepared to acknowledge that the cost figure that I have used (US$10 a barrel)could possibly be correct and claim that it has been stated as US$15 a barrel.
But there we have it in the OGW article as being quoted by the NZOG spokesman (another incompetent official I suppose - oh this time the CEO I think) as being LESS THAN US$10 a BARREL

Can I get an acknowledgement about that dargie my friend ?????