How well you demonstrate, that you don't understand...

How well you demonstrate, that you don't understand subtlety.

It's not my job to spruik, but to ask questions, sometimes they're leading questions.

But you hardly comprehend the difference do you?

I held LYC early on and got out after Nick Curtis did a questionable sale and then caused a shareholder revolt around 2014.

I think the company is far better led now than then but it's had issues with the Malaysian government and licence conditions. Hopefully they will be lifted and the runway will be clear.

Of course everyone allocates investments according to different criteria including risk, and I have to say I did well with AZS in place of LYC. Now I have other commitments but I've had this one in the watch list for some time.

You're full of bluster, mate.
Bearing in mind that your insults are a function of your assumptions, I have to tell you they're hilariously wrong.

Right now I have positions in gold explorers, gold miners, and gold exploration companies with exposure to silver, transitioning into mining. I like the Capricorn Metals model and any company that has that, also has my attention.

I also have a significant for me, position with a biotech listed on the Nasdaq and sitting on 300% profit on that one, but what would I know?

And BTW people have different interpretations of how to use the sentiment disclosure. Some say it's about what they're just about to do, others say it's about how they view the prospects of the company overall. They're very different.

If I position myself into buying back into LYC as a more mature company, it won't be thanks to anything you have to say.

If I need to find you in the future I know where to look, the ignored button