Yes lots of cherry picking, note the article mentions both positive and negative effects.
Greenland is getting positive effects from global warming, with less ice/snow on the ground in the warmer months more land can be used for agriculture.
What the AGW sceptics ignore is that the impact of AGW will/could be in the longer term, we may not know exactly what it will be but if we ignore it, it becomes more and more difficalt to address and at some point become irreversible if not already.
The simple logic is that you can't keep pollution an enclosed environment indefinably and expect no damage
