Business spectator has launched a new news website "Climate Spectator" here's one topic on geothermal. They talk of lack of equipment for geothermal, well hello CKK is here.
Australias first cleantech bubble has well and truly burst. The geothermal energy industry has lost practically all support from the investment community, and share prices are a fraction of what they were just a year or two ago. Hundreds of millions in market value has been wiped from the board.
In the history of market bubbles, this might have passed unlamented. But geothermal energy is not a mere passing fad, or a cool iphone app it forms a crucial part of the governments renewable energy strategy, and is supposed to be the centre of $15 billion of investment over the next decade.
As things currently stand, that looks impossible, and the government, in danger of another embarrassing debacle in its renewable energy policy, is under increasing pressure to take action to help de-risk the sector.
Cleantech and renewable energy investments as a whole are in a sorry state in this country. The 75-company Australian Cleantech Index, a basket of renewable, environmental, waste and biofuel stocks with a combined market value of $10 billion, slumped 32 per cent in fiscal 2010, compared to an 11.8 per cent gain for the ASX200 and a 10.5 per cent gain for the ASX Small Ords.
Cleantech Australia managing director John OBrien blames weak and inconsistent political leadership on environmental issues for this fall. The story of environmental investments in Australia is a depressing one compared to global cleantech stock performance, he says.
The geothermal index was the weakest component, losing 57 per cent in the last 12 months, following a 34 per cent loss the year before. Even the two market leaders, Geodynamics and Petratherm, who share $153 million in government grants between them if they can advance their projects far enough have slumped by two thirds in the last six months.
Yet, according to the Federal governments own estimates, geothermal energy could provide more than one quarter of 41,000 gigawatt hours required to meet its 20 per cent renewable energy target. And the governments own Energy Resource Assessment rates geothermal as the likely cheapest and cleanest form of baseload energy (including clean coal and nuclear) by 2030.
But in its current state, the industry fears it will be unable to deliver. It simply doesnt have the support of the market to raise funds for the relatively expensive task of drilling.
Insiders in the industry says it is difficult to get investors on board because they cannot yet see the business case for the technology. The lack of a carbon price has not helped, nor has the uncertainty of the renewable energy target, the weak global equity markets and, most recently, the withdrawal of the exploration rebate as a result of the compromise over the mining tax.
There have also been set-back at some of the few wells that have been drilled, most notably the blow-out at Geodynamics project in the Cooper Basin and the uncertain results from the Panax well at its Penola project.
Geothermal is not a new power source. It has been exploited for more than 100 years, theres 10,000 megawatts of capacity already installed around the world and there are predictions of rapid growth across the world.
Australias resources, one per cent of which could power the country 26,000 times over, according to Geoscience Australia, lie deeper than the rest of the world and pose unique challenges because of that.
The industry recognises that there will be setbacks in certain developments, but rather than focusing assistance on a handful of projects and putting all eggs in one basket, there needs to be broader support.
For a start, this would encourage more rigs to be made available for drilling right now there is an interminable queue for the few available, and would increase the chance of success that would create the necessary trigger for large scale investment in the sector, and expand targets industrial, heating, and energy across all states.
The industry estimates around $500 million is needed much less, it argues, than has been promised to the large scale solar and carbon capture and storage sectors.
Like other renewable sectors, it would also favour broader based mechanisms such as specific feed in tariffs , tax credits, or loan guarantees a mixture of which is available in almost every other industrial nation, but has not so far been countenanced in Australia.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CKK
- interesting reading from news website
interesting reading from news website
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)