interesting to compare:

the last 2 anns in German:

1. Meldung vom 28.10:

- "...Die Ölproben und Spülungsfiltratproben aus dem
Bohrloch werden inzwischen in einem britischen Labor
ausgewertet, entsprechende Analysen haben bereits
begonnen. Die Informationen über Ölqualität und chem.
Zusammensetzung werden innerhalb einer
Woche erwartet...".

2. Meldung vom 03.11.:

- "Die chemischen Analysen der von ADX ... entnommenen
Proben durch Corelab in Großbritannien bestätigen: Bei
den Reservoirflüssigkeiten handelt es sich um Rohöl aus
einem aktiven Ölfeld sowie um Bohrschlammfiltrat mit
geringem Wasseranteil.."

http://www.adxenergy.com.au/announcements.php
-------------------------------------------


That means:

1. Ann from 28th Okt.:

"The oil and mud filtrade samples recovered from the well
have arrived at the laboratory in the UK. Analysis has
commenced with results which will provide information
on oil quality and chemical composition expected within
one week..."

2. Ann from 3rd of Nov.:

"The chem. analysis undertaken by Corelab in the UK, of
the from ADX recovered well samples confirms: By the
reservoire fluids is it a matter on crude oil out of a
active oilfield and mud filtrate with minor amounts of
of water..."


We have to look on the difference:

1. They have given to the laboratory samples of oil and samples of mud filtrate. The result of the analysis also distinguishes between the samples of oil and the other samples mud filtrade.

2. And the result of the oil is: it is crude oil out of a ACTIV OILFIELD.


Thats different to the English version!


And we know that there is oil production in the direct bordering/neighbouring areas. Not only this, in the announcments is to read that they product out of the same shift/layer which ADX explored. So and now remember: the ADX area is 25 square km.

So make your own thougth.


Cheers

Tilly