encore...I posted a detailed analysis some ime back on the...

encore...

I posted a detailed analysis some ime back on the potential value of the copper in the ground at CDB...and Catabola...and applied a lower wider guestimation for the rest of the potential in-ground copper assets.

Perhaps someone wo has time can go back and find it?

Anyway, they were all based on "value today" type valuations, projected back from clearly much higher prices down he track. All this was pesented with supporting calculations.

I see PWC have run a similar exercise in today's report, using DCF and NPV's!

If you really wanted to discuss these assets as you say, you could have easily responded to my initial post with a non-personal, factual discussion.

By memory, you didn't.

Perhaps if you had it in you to reflect at times..and possibly even realise you might just be wrong about me (lol...heaven forbid), then we might actually have something genuine to discuss from time to time.

I am always happy to discuss any aspect of the stock I feel is relevant, if I have time...just as long as the post is not yet another time wasting baiting exercise, which I see far too often unfortunately.

The sad thing is...CVI is the sort of stock where we could all make money...all sharing in the experience and knowledge of others on HC (as HC should be used)...instead, we see people on here intent on preying on one another for the sake of small change...ultimately tipping many out, who miss out all together.

Without these people, and the pressure their activity has bought to the stock, previous placements would have been much higher, andtoday's jump would have been from a base well over 30c.

Not nice

Cheers!