''Lol, not at all. Foreign powers aren't as emotive as you and the rest of the Yes's. They will give it due attention, put it down to a dopey Prime Minister and move on.''
whilst they might not be emotive ----------- in future years there will more than likely be UN or similar based findings on reparations for historic wrong doings. The movement has well begun and is gathering pace and strength
Australia is a low hanging fruit for that one - a sitting duck. It's been found in it's own courts to have done wrong already.
It's crystal clear that it was invaded. It's crystal clear that there has been harm done and that it's continued to today in disadvantage.
The voice - the refusal of Australian voters and states to allow a say in matters when asked - WILL be used against it in such future cases. Why? -- because it's part of the story, part of the pattern.
you say that Foreign powers aren't emotive ---------- you are correct ------------- and that is the problem for Australia. Foreign powers will look at the evidence.
And the refusal to allow someone to have a say when asking ------- is evidence. Clear and unequivocal
- Forums
- Political Debate
- International perspectives on the referendum
International perspectives on the referendum, page-100
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 105 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online