Share
2,508 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 331
clock Created with Sketch.
19/10/23
16:21
Share
Originally posted by pintohoo
↑
''Lol, not at all. Foreign powers aren't as emotive as you and the rest of the Yes's. They will give it due attention, put it down to a dopey Prime Minister and move on.''
whilst they might not be emotive ----------- in future years there will more than likely be UN or similar based findings on reparations for historic wrong doings. The movement has well begun and is gathering pace and strength
Australia is a low hanging fruit for that one - a sitting duck. It's been found in it's own courts to have done wrong already.
It's crystal clear that it was invaded. It's crystal clear that there has been harm done and that it's continued to today in disadvantage.
The voice - the refusal of Australian voters and states to allow a say in matters when asked - WILL be used against it in such future cases. Why? -- because it's part of the story, part of the pattern.
you say that Foreign powers aren't emotive ---------- you are correct ------------- and that is the problem for Australia. Foreign powers will look at the evidence.
And the refusal to allow someone to have a say when asking ------- is evidence. Clear and unequivocal
Expand
If that was even the remotest threat the Government of the day would simply legislate it, as they could have done when they came to office, or now after the refrendum has been sunk. It also doesn't sound right that they would care that we didn't implement a body whose opinions could be roundly ignored.