You wrote : ” Realistically, for a game-changing or disrupted...

You wrote :
” Realistically, for a game-changing or disrupted technology to be bought out by a big player, the technology must go through strenuous testing - and that might mean years - not months.I have NO reservations about the technology, I am more concerned about the time and clarity in its strategic directions and to be more specfic: the TIME-Frame. It will be a long journey - I am now expecting another 3-4 years. By then, there is a risk of a pother company might be able to ovetake 4DS in the race.”

Obviously you have a lot of skin in the game, and it is obviously your decision what you do next. Can I just ask you to help us understand why you think strenuous testing might mean years ? And why you think a new time frame of 3-4 years is now in play? These time frames all sound a bit random CXO888, and I am sure others here would be interested to know how you decided on these time frames.

I understand totally how anxiety provoking this period of uncertainty is and the company is doing very little to alleviate this anxiety. DM’s choice of words in the latest interview does nothing to make us feel more secure. Perhaps it is simply poor communication, perhaps we are so sensitive we are jumping at shadows. Who would know for sure.