I know it’s not a winner take all equation. I just thought weebit’s the only one using silicon oxide for reram (and weebit has always emphasised this major advantage as well). In this article, they were asked their differentiating factor from weebit, not an engineer but I’m guessing it’s more on the technicals. It just read to me that they are trying to commercialise this ‘silicon oxide reram technology’ which is exactly what weebit is trying to do as well.
But thanks for your thoughts on this.
I hope I’m just being a bit of a worry wort...
I know it’s not a winner take all equation. I just thought...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WBT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.93 |
Change
-0.015(0.77%) |
Mkt cap ! $364.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.98 | $2.05 | $1.93 | $1.615M | 818.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 6900 | $1.93 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.95 | 5000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WBT (ASX) Chart |